When we focus too much attention on the atoning work of the blood we miss the identification with Christ available to us in his brokenness. How can we look at our sin until we have made peace with our suffering? How did we get so preoccupied with the blood? It is significant, yes! The shaming and suffering of Jesus is discussed at length, and yet we rush ahead to the cross, to the blood. We are so uncomfortable with the guilt implication of our sin that we miss how he is also capable of understanding our suffering, our shame. How should we understand his understanding of betrayal and abandonment? How do we process the idea that he didn't just experience suffering like ours, but somehow on the cross he suffered our grief and our suffering?
This points to a bigger issue that I have been pondering a lot lately. Why does the church spend so much time focusing on salvation from hell when salvation from sin is just as significant. People hunger for the power of a joyful life today. They hunger for freedom. They hunger for a kingdom life lived here on earth. But we, church, do not offer that. We fail to preach sanctification.
Soundtrack: Sweetly Broken, Jeremy Riddle
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/418b5/418b5ac862eb924141daffd8315c67ce3d7aaf73" alt="Share/Bookmark"
Very good thoughts here- not either but both and-- right?
ReplyDeleteProductive blog you have here.